Budgeting for Babies

21 May

I watched with interest on Tuesday Night as Treasurer Wayne Swan handed down his budget.  One of our governments major ‘structural saves’ as they are now called was to downsize the ‘Baby Bonus.’  The bonus for first children will now be $2,000 instead of $5,000.   Aside from embarassingly exposing my own self-interest (one of my first thoughts was ‘Ahh it doesn’t matter we’ve had our children …’), the change got me thinking about the language we use to talk about children.


It seems to me that just about everything we speak of these days is measured by it’s impact on ‘the economy,’ children included.   Of course this is especially true on budget night but I’m sure you’d agree that just about every government proposal we hear about these days is measured primarily in ‘economic terms.’    It’s impact on ‘the ecomomy’ is our major concern.  Now don’t get me wrong I’m not anti-capitalism.  After all, history says that the free market economy we are a part of can trace it’s foundations to John Calvin’s Geneva.  Not only did Calvin preserve the doctrine of ‘Justification by Faith’ but he also, many argue, laid key foundations for how our free market ecomony operates in the Modern West.  Though that’s a story for another day!  My point here is to ask … is there a danger in thinking about children and the having of them using ‘economic terms’?


When talking about the birth of children what’s the best word to use?  Bioethicist Leon Kass underlines the importance of this point when he writes”


“Consider the views of life and the world reflected in the following different expressions to describe the process of generating new life.  Ancient Israel, impressed with the phenomenon of the transmission of life from father to son, used a word we translate as “begetting” or “siring” [meaning creating the same moral value as the begetter].  The Greeks, impressed with the springing forth of new life … called it genesis, from a root meaning “to come into being” … The premodern Christian English-speaking world, impressed with the world as given by a Creator, used the term “pro-creation”.  We, impressed with the machine and the gross national product (our own work of creation), employ the metaphor of the factory, “re-production”.[1]


The language we use says a lot about how as a society with view our little ones.  Of course there are very real ‘economic’ realities to having children which all parents and would be parents no doubt realise.  As a single income family we are certainly very thankful for the assistance we receive from both our church family and from the government.  The generosity of God through our church and the various family tax benefits we receive enables us to do what we do.  Yet, although having our children involves very real economic considerations – viewing our children through the lense of ‘the economy’ is never how the bible encourages us to imagine them.  Babies are always a bonus whether they come with an economic bonus or not!  Our children are a ‘gift’ not a ‘commodity.’  We don’t produce them they are given to us.


When Lenore and I welcomed Hannah into our family we were students at Moore Theological College.  Funds were tight.  Sharing $6 Thai for dinner and getting the leftover bread from Bakers Delight that they gave to students was part of the fun of life in Newtown.  We welcomed Hannah to join us in the fun.  Sharing meals in community at college with other students and their young families was such a joyful experience and was also a great way to help each other have enough money to get by.  Now, if Lenore and I were ever tempted to complain about our lot in life as the money to do what others our age were doing just wasn’t there, all we needed to do was walk down King Street in Newtown and see the men who’s life was dependent on the generosity of those who walked past their bedroom on the street.  I started to think that perhaps some of the bonuses we received to have our Hannah would have been better directed towards those men.  Regardless of our views on these things it did help me at least to not watch budget night with such a sense of ‘entitlement,’ but with a hope that God would grant great wisdom to our government to govern justly as they distributed the enormous resources at their disposal.


The ‘economic’ considerations of having children are many and yet the bible teaches us to keep other things in mind well ahead of the dollars and cents. It teaches us that each child conceived is uniquely made ‘in the image of God’ (Gen 1:26-27) and by Him.  When they are born we welcome another person into the creation to share together with in the priviledge of ruling God’s world under Him (Gen 1:28).  It reminds us that it is God’s ‘eyes [who] saw my unformed substance’.  It suggests that, biologically speaking, from the moment of fertilization another human has come into being whose days ‘every one of them in [God’s] book has been written’ (Psalm 139:16).  It is clear that God has planned the lives of our children even before we knew they were there.


In our culture the reasons many give to have children usually include things like:

–  to continue the family line

–  to look after us when we are old

–  for self-fulfillment

–  as a physical representation of your “one-flesh”

–  to help in the family business


It’s true that the desire to have children is very strong for many of us, and it is often terribly painful for those who are unable to fulfil that good desire.


Yet, as Megan Best says in her fantastic book, our reasons for welcoming children as Christians ought to be different.


“Christians see child-bearing not as a way to find self-fulfillment so much as to raise up “Godly offspring” (Mal 2:15).  A new generation must learn how to exert responsible dominion over the creation, and while we are waiting for Christ to return we are called to proclaim the gospel. […] The Bible does not suggest we possess our children, but we receive them as a gift[2]


              “Behold, children are a gift of the LORD;

              the fruit of the womb is a reward.”

              Psalm 127:3


It’s why as followers of Jesus we often welcome children when ‘economically’ it just doesn’t make sense.  It’s why we stick up for their ‘rights’ and not only the ‘rights’ of those who exercise influence over their very existence.  Our little ones are part of the ‘creation’ not the ‘economy.’  We don’t welcome children into the world for our sake, but for their sake, so that we can serve God together in His world.



[1] LR Kass, Toward a More Natural Science, The Free Press, New York, 1988, p. 48.  Cited in M Best, Fearfully and Wonderfully Made, Matthias Media, Sydney, 2013, p. 53-4.

[2] Best, Fearfully and Wonderfully Made, 63.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: